Legal Opinion

Kolouch v. Kramer

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1991No. 18764PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Chief Justice.

This is an action by plaintiffs Kolouchs (Kolouch) to quiet title to an easement by written grant. Kolouch received a deeded easement over property now owned by defendants/appellants (Kramer). Kramer defended the action by arguing that the easement had been extinguished through adverse possession. The trial court quieted title in Kolouch, and Kramer has appealed this ruling.

On February 26, 1959, Kolouch purchased Lot 10 of the Holohan Addition, Twin Falls County, Idaho, except the east 125 feet thereof, from John P. Smith and Thelma P. Smith. The deed conveying the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Castle Associates v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Herzog v. GrossoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Fristoe v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Barber v. HonorofIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. City of Edmonds v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Conley v. WhittleseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Jen-Rath Co. v. Kit Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Mueller v. HoblynWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API