Legal Opinion

Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 19, 1998No. 97SC529PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

The issue before us is the proper approach for determining whether a particular use of an expressly granted easement over land is permitted. We granted certiorari to decide whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel precludes a challenge to a particular use of an easement when the dimensions of the easement have been established by previous litigation. 1 Because the size of the easement and the use of the easement are distinct concepts, we hold that a party to the earlier litigation is not estopped from challenging a particular use, even if the challenged use takes place within the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Union Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. URS Corp. v. AshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Bard Ranch Company v. WeberWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Lakes at Mercer Island Homeowners Ass'n v. WitrakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Bebo Construction Co. v. Mattox & O'Brien, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. Lane v. UrgitusSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  4. Roaring Fork Club, L.P. v. St. Jude's Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Lobato v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API