Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez
The issue before us is the proper approach for determining whether a particular use of an expressly granted easement over land is permitted. We granted certiorari to decide whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel precludes a challenge to a particular use of an easement when the dimensions of the easement have been established by previous litigation. 1 Because the size of the easement and the use of the easement are distinct concepts, we hold that a party to the earlier litigation is not estopped from challenging a particular use, even if the challenged use takes place within the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Union Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- URS Corp. v. AshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Bard Ranch Company v. WeberWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Lakes at Mercer Island Homeowners Ass'n v. WitrakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Bebo Construction Co. v. Mattox & O'Brien, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Lane v. UrgitusSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Roaring Fork Club, L.P. v. St. Jude's Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Lobato v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.