Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Hoblyn

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1994No. 94-1 to 94-4PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

The right to use an easement is at issue in these consolidated appeals. The owners of the dominant estate filed an action against the owner of the servient estate to quiet title to the easement. The owners of the dominant estate claimed they had been denied use of the easement. The owner of the servient estate maintained the entire easement had been lost by adverse possession. Using a variety of procedural means, other present and former owners of dominant estates also became parties to this action. After a bench trial, the district court determined that only a small portion…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Castle Associates v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Spiegel v. FerraroNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Gray v. FitzhughWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Edgcomb v. Lower Valley Power & Light, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hasvold v. Park County School District Number 6Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Malloy v. ReyesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  4. Markstein v. Countryside I, L.L.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API