Legal Opinion

Fristoe v. Drapeau

California Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1950No. L. A. 20657PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

This action was brought to enjoin interference with the use of a roadway constructed by the common grantor of the parties. Defendants have appealed from a judgment which decrees that the parties have an equal right to use the roadway as a means of ingress and egress to and from their respective parcels. Defendants also noticed an appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The order is nonappealable, and the attempted appeal therefrom is dismissed. (See Casner v. Daily News Co., Ltd., 16 Cal.2d 410, 415 [106 P.2d 201]; cf., Fickett v. Rauch, 31 Cal.2d 110, 111 [187 P.2d 402].)

Th…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Danielson v. SykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Haviland v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Silveira v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Fickett v. RauchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Fischer v. HendlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Neff v. ErnstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Tusher v. GabrielsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Kolouch v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API