Fristoe v. Drapeau
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
This action was brought to enjoin interference with the use of a roadway constructed by the common grantor of the parties. Defendants have appealed from a judgment which decrees that the parties have an equal right to use the roadway as a means of ingress and egress to and from their respective parcels. Defendants also noticed an appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The order is nonappealable, and the attempted appeal therefrom is dismissed. (See Casner v. Daily News Co., Ltd., 16 Cal.2d 410, 415 [106 P.2d 201]; cf., Fickett v. Rauch, 31 Cal.2d 110, 111 [187 P.2d 402].)
Th…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Danielson v. SykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Haviland v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Silveira v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Fickett v. RauchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Fischer v. HendlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Neff v. ErnstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Tusher v. GabrielsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Kolouch v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.