Legal Opinion

Barber v. Honorof

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1989No. 17631PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTLEY, Justice.

This is an appeal by Frank and Carol Honorof (Honorof) from a judgment in favor of Jeff Barber (Barber) in an action to foreclose a materialman’s lien. We affirm the judgment of the trial court insofar as it ordered the lien foreclosed, dismissed Honorof’s counterclaim, and denied Barber’s request for prejudgment interest. However, we reverse and remand this case to the district court to determine Barber’s reasonable attorney fees.

Background of the Appeal

This action arose out of a contract dispute between Barber and Honorof respecting certain concrete work performed at the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Pierson v. SewellIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Davis v. Professional Business Services, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Jaynes v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ervin Construction Co. v. Van OrdenIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Electrical Wholesale Supply Co. v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Bradshaw v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API