Legal Opinion

City of Edmonds v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 26, 1989No. 21448-9-IPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchumacher, J.

* —Kenneth Williams, Sr., and Jane Doe Williams (Williams), appeal from an order of summary judgment establishing an easement over Williams' property. We affirm.

Williams and the City of Edmonds (City) own adjacent parcels of real property. For purposes of this opinion, the City's parcel is referred to as parcel A; Williams' parcel is referred to as parcel B. Both parcels A and B were owned by Myron and Ruth Hamlin (Hamlin) until July 30, 1969. On that date, Hamlin conveyed parcel A to Neil and Mildred Matson. The parcel A deed included "an easement for ingress, egress and utilities over,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Castle Associates v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Town of West Seattle v. West Seattle Land & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Gustaveson v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Brower v. WellsWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Thompson v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Halverson v. TurnerMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mueller v. HoblynWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Kolouch v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Beebe v. SwerdaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API