Legal Opinion
Hines v. Bair
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 27, 2009No. Civil Action 98-0203 (RWR)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kathleen Hines filed this action alleging that her employer, defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), had retaliated against her by refusing to promote her, and denying her request to transfer to another division with her slot. 2 At the close of discovery, defendant moved for summary judgment. Because plaintiff did not pursue timely her administrative remedies with respect to her non-promotion claim, and she has not rebutted defendant’s legitimate non-retaliatory reason for denying plaintiffs request to transfer…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Roy E. Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Winston v. CloughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Byrd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Thomas v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Hairston v. TapellaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Hopkins v. WhippleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.