Legal Opinion
Byrd v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 16, 2011No. 1:06-cv-522PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This dispute originates from allegations of sexual harassment by former female employees of the District of Columbia Department of Parks and Recreation (“DPR”) against their male supervisors. Plaintiffs Garrina Byrd, Demera Gaskins, Annette Burns, and Carmen Jean-Baptiste bring this suit against the District of Columbia seeking damages for unlawful sexual harassment and discrimination that each suffered during the course of their employment. Plaintiffs allege several violations of numerous provisions of Title VII of the Civil…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Dudley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Slate v. Public Defender Service for the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Ayala v. Tito Contractors, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Sledge v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.