Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 22, 2010No. Civil Action 08-0042 (AK)PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

ALAN KAY, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending before this Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Mot. for Summ. J.”) 2 [42], Plaintiffs Opposition and Memorandum of Points and Authorities to Defendant’s Motion (“Opp’n to Mot. for Summ. J.”) [47], and Defendant’s Reply to the Opposition (“Reply to Mot. for Summ. J.”) [53]. The Court held a hearing on Defendant’s Motion on April 9, 2010. For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant’s Motion is granted in part and denied in part. An appropriate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

I. BACKGROUND

On January 8,…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Allen v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Mount v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Nguyen v. WinterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. Hyson v. Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Byrd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API