Legal Opinion
Hairston v. Tapella
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 21, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1531 (RWR)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kevin Hairston filed a discrimination complaint under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleging that his employer, the Government Printing Office (“GPO”), failed to promote him because of his race and retaliated against him for complaining about it. The GPO moved to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of jurisdiction due to Hairston’s failure to timely exhaust his administrative remedies, and Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Because there are disputed material facts…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Winston v. CloughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Vasser v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Terveer v. BillingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Jones v. BernankeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Faison v. Vance-CooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.