Legal Opinion

Durphy v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1997No. 94-CV-851, 94-CV-1136PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGNER, Chief Judge.

Appellants, Frank Durphy and his wife, Elizabeth Durphy, filed a medical malpractice action against Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Mid-Atlantic States, Inc. (Kaiser) alleging that Kaiser’s physician employees negligently failed to diagnose timely and treat properly Mr. Durphy’s osteomyelitis, a bone infection, as the result of which Mr. Durphy’s right foot had to be amputated. Mrs. Durphy sued for loss of consortium resulting from Kaiser’s negligence. Kaiser denied the allegations of negligence and contended that any injuries and damages sustained by Mr. Durphy…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  4. Morrison v. MacNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. United States v. MaserattiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lively v. Flexible Packaging Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Railan v. KatyalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Washington Convention Center Authority v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Harding v. DeissMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Walter v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API