Legal Opinion

Morrison v. MacNamara

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1979No. 13503, 13504PublishedCited by 157 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

Appellant Morrison, a plaintiff in a medical malpractice action in the trial court, challenges a judgment in favor of appellees, a nationally certified medical laboratory and a medical technician. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his requested jury instruction that the standard of care to which appellees should be held is a national standard as opposed to a local one. He further contends that the trial court erred in permitting the jury to consider the issue of assumption of the risk. We agree with appellant on both contentions and reverse. 1

In Part I, we…

2Cases cited90 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Bruni v. TatsumiOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  5. Runyon v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by157 opinions

  1. Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker ClinicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Hall v. HilbunMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Washington v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. O'NEIL v. BerganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Meek v. ShepardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API