Legal Opinion
Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 6, 1960No. 12880PublishedCited by 365 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
This is a diversity case. Lind, the plaintiff-appellant, sued Park & Tilford Distiller’s Corp.,1 the defendant-appellee, for compensation that he asserts is due him by virtue of a contract expressed by a written memorandum supplemented by oral conversations as set out hereinafter. Lind also sued for certain expenses he incurred when moving from New Jersey to New York when his position as New Jersey State Manager of Park & Til-ford terminated on January 31, 1957. The evidence, including Lind’s own testimony, taking the inferences most favorable to Lind, shows the following.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wen Kroy Realty Co. v. Public National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Werthan Bag Corp. v. Agnew. Agnew v. Werthan Bag CorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by365 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Barbara R. Sheridan v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Jacques AmblardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Elliot Fineman the Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Chavers v. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Linda Holmes v. City of Massillon, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
360 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.