Legal Opinion

Purkett v. Elem

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 15, 1995No. 94-802PublishedCited by 2,528 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was convicted of second-degree robbery in a Missouri court. During jury selection, he objected to the prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenges to strike two black men from the jury panel, an objection arguably based on Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U. S. 79 (1986). The prosecutor explained his strikes:

“I struck [juror] number twenty-two because of his long hair. He had long curly hair. He had the longest hair of anybody on the panel by far. He appeared to me to not be a good juror for that fact, the fact that he had long hair hanging down shoulder length, curly, unkempt hair. Also, he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,528 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Snyder v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Rice v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

2,523 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API