Legal Opinion
Washington Convention Center Authority v. Johnson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 31, 2008No. 04-CV-193, 04-CV-387PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
The case before us was tried by a jury, which found in plaintiff Langdon Johnson’s favor on claims of age discrimination, violation of the District of Columbia Family and Medical Leave Act (“DCFMLA”), and unequal pay. In a post-trial motion, the Washington Convention Center Authority (“WCCA”) and Lewis Dawley (collectively, “defendants”) requested judgment as a matter of law. The trial court denied their request, but reduced the damages award. Johnson also moved to alter or amend the judgment to award front pay. The trial court denied this motion. Each party has…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Schuler v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Badwal v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Williams v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Hamilton v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Musgrove v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.