Legal Opinion
Railan v. Katyal
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 15, 2001No. 96-CV-1711PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from the judgment on a jury verdict awarding compensatory and punitive damages for breach of an oral contract and fraudulent misrepresentation and from the trial court’s denial of a counterclaim for a deficiency judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
Statement of the Case
Appellees, Jagdish (“Jack”) Katyal and his wife, Mohana Katyal, sued appellants, Vikramaditya (“Vik”) Railan and his wife, Dr. Veena Railan (the Railans), for breach of contract, fraudulent misrepresentation, and injunctive relief to halt a foreclosure sale on a building…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bennett v. KigginsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Homan v. GoyalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Jonathan Woodner Co. v. BreedenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Fort Lincoln Civic Ass'n v. Fort Lincoln New Town Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Gregorio v. HooverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Washington Convention Center Authority v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Cook v. Edgewood Management Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Kumar v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.