Legal Opinion

Harding v. Deiss

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2000No. 99-213PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

¶1 Marsha Harding (Appellant) appeals from the denial by the Third Judicial District Court, Deer Lodge County, of her motion for a mistrial, and its issuance of a jury instruction on comparative negligence. We reverse.

¶2 We restate Appellant’s issues on appeal as follows:

I. Did the District Court err in allowing Respondents to present argument and jury instructions on comparative negligence?

II. Did the District Court err in preventing Appellant from addressing the issue of comparative negligence in her closing argument?

III. Were statements made by defense counsel in the jury’s presence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Federated Mutual Insurance v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Durphy v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Whitehead v. LinkousDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. State v. SoraichMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Bryant v. CalantoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Mercer v. Vanderbilt University, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. HerrmanMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. ScarboroughMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Reeves v. HealyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Krklus v. StanleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API