Legal Opinion

Rudd v. California Casualty General Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1990No. D009636PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FROEHLICH, J.

Uninsured motorist insurance coverage, first adopted in California in 1961, 1 was designed to provide motorists injured by an uninsured tortfeasor minimum recovery from their own insurers. Such coverage applied only to the situation in which the negligent driver who inflicted injury on the insured person was completely without insurance. Failure to compensate the injured party also resulted, however, when damage was incurred in excess of the often minimal insurance coverage purchased by the tortfeasor. To remedy this perceived defect in the insurance coverage framework,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance LoansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Killian v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Travelers Insurance v. BouzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Shapiro v. San Diego City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. MacRiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Kilner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. Mamika v. BarcaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API