West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance Loans
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
In this action to recover statutory penalties for usury and to obtain an accounting we examine the financing methods of a personal property broker. We uphold the trial court’s finding that the transactions under scrutiny did not constitute purchases by the broker of conditional sales contracts but were in fact loans by the broker secured by pledges of such contracts. As we explain infra, we conclude that the loans were exempted from the provisions of the Personal Property Brokers Law prescribing maximum charges and rates, were not violative of specified provisions of that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Stockton Savings & Loan Bank v. MassanetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Palos Verdes Faculty Ass'n v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.