Legal Opinion

West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance Loans

California Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1970No. L.A. 29656PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

In this action to recover statutory penalties for usury and to obtain an accounting we examine the financing methods of a personal property broker. We uphold the trial court’s finding that the transactions under scrutiny did not constitute purchases by the broker of conditional sales contracts but were in fact loans by the broker secured by pledges of such contracts. As we explain infra, we conclude that the loans were exempted from the provisions of the Personal Property Brokers Law prescribing maximum charges and rates, were not violative of specified provisions of that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Stockton Savings & Loan Bank v. MassanetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Palos Verdes Faculty Ass'n v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API