Legal Opinion

Kilner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1993No. 68,205PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

Plaintiff Wayne Kilner, who was injured by an underinsured motorist, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to his insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). The order allows plaintiff’s insurer, pursuant to K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 40-284(e)(4), to offset against its underinsured motorist coverage liability nonduplicative workers compensation benefits paid by the plaintiff’s employer’s insurer.

The appeal is on an agreed statement pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 3.05 (1992 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 17). Facts set…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sulser v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. State v. AdeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  4. Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Rudd v. California Casualty General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Varney Business Services, Inc. v. PottroffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. Blair Construction, Inc. v. McBethSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Miller v. BotwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. Mitchell v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API