Legal Opinion
Shapiro v. San Diego City Council
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 5, 2002No. D037323PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, J.
The defendant San Diego City Council (City Council) appeals a judgment issued under the Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act) (Gov. Code, 1 § 54950 et seq.) to compel it to comply with certain duties under the Brown Act in closed session discussions with its real estate negotiators, concerning the posting of agenda items and the restriction of discussion within such closed sessions to the posted agenda items. (§§ 54956.8, 54954.5, subd. (b), 54954.2, subd. (a).) This action was brought by plaintiff and respondent Melvin Shapiro, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to require…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Bell v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Rudd v. California Casualty General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- San Diego Union v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- HUONG QUE, INC. v. LuuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Krumme v. Mercury InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- City of Claremont v. KruseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.