Legal Opinion

Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. MacRi

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1992No. S025579PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

We granted review to determine whether Insurance Code section 11580.2, subdivision (c)(3) (hereafter § 11580.2(c)(3); all statutory references are to this code unless otherwise stated), requiring an insured to *322obtain the written consent of the insurer before the insured makes “any settlement with or prosecute[s] to judgment any action against” an uninsured motorist, also applies when an insured seeks underinsured motorist benefits under the same policy.

Although underinsured motorist benefits, like uninsured motorist benefits, are governed by section 11580.2, the statutory…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Rudd v. California Casualty General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MessingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Lennane v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Quintano v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Home Ins. Co. v. Zurich Insurance CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Ford & Vlahos v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Texas Commerce Bank v. GaramendiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API