Legal Opinion
Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co. v. Schmitz
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 12, 1991No. 8849PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
Robert and Marion Schmitz1 appeal the trial court’s ruling on their motion to open the judgment of foreclosure by sale and to extend the sale date, and on a codefendant’s motion for a stay of execution. The Schmitzes claim that the trial court improperly (1) opened the judgment of foreclosure and extended the sale date for only four weeks, and (2) refused to grant a codefendant’s motion for a stay of execution. We find that these issues are not properly before this court and dismiss the appeal.
The trial court found the following facts. The plaintiff brought this foreclosure action by writ,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Hartford Principals' & Supervisors' Ass'n v. SheddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Wedig v. BrinsterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Kulmacz v. KulmaczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Zinman v. MaislenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Seymour v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Santoro v. SantoroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc. v. GurskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Willocks v. KleinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- In re Robin M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.