Legal Opinion

Hartford Principals' & Supervisors' Ass'n v. Shedd

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 10, 1987No. 12697PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether mediation and binding arbitration procedures under the Teacher Negotiation Act are available to resolve contractual disputes between a school board and an employees’ union arising during the term of an existing contract. The plaintiff, Hartford Principals’ and Supervisors’ Association, unsuccessfully appealed to the Superior Court a declaratory ruling on two petitions it had filed with the commissioner of education in which the commissioner held that the mediation and arbitration provisions of the act apply only to the process of bargaining for…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Unisys Corp. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Jutkowitz v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Massameno v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API