Legal Opinion

Santoro v. Santoro

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 29, 1994No. 13001PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, Nellie Santoro, has filed an amended appeal from the trial court’s order granting the motion by the plaintiff, Ernest Santoro, to terminate the automatic stay. The dispositive issue is whether the defendant can properly appeal from the trial court's order granting the plaintiff's motion to terminate the stay. We conclude that Practice Book § 40491 requires that the amended appeal be dismissed.2

The facts of this case are not in dispute. The trial court dissolved the parties’ marriage on October 19, 1993, and ordered the defendant to vacate the family residence within forty-five…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mulholland v. MulhollandConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. State v. HollowayConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  3. Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co. v. SchmitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. In re Clifton B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. CasianoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Andrews v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  3. Doe v. BemerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  4. Lawrence v. CordsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  5. R. F. Daddario & Sons, Inc. v. ShelanskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API