Legal Opinion
Wedig v. Brinster
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 14, 1983No. (2264) (2265)PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
These actions tried together are for fraudulent misrepresentation arising out of the sale of a house at Sachem’s Head in Guilford. The house’s septic tank overflow was piped directly into Long Island Sound. The trial court found for the plaintiffs against the defendants Frank and Charlotte Brinster and awarded them $12,068.69 in compensatory damages and $10,000 in reasonable attorney’s fees. The court found no consequential damages, and it dismissed the suit against the defendant Mitchell (Brinsters’ agent), holding that it was barred by General Statutes § 52-584. The Brinsters have appealed,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Collens v. New Canaan Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Layman v. BinnsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Woodling v. Garrett Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Kavarco v. T. J. E., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Bernard v. GershmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- OBG Technical Services, Inc. v. Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp. Ex Rel. TRW, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.