Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Seymour

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 3, 2002No. SC 16502PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiffs in error, Allyn Seymour and Frances Waterman Seymour (plaintiffs), bring this *108writ of error claiming that the trial court improperly denied their motion for a protective order with respect to the taking of their depositions in a Massachusetts action involving their son, Robert Waterman Seymour, and the defendant in error, lisa Repp Seymour (defendant). We conclude that the plaintiffs, having been granted their request in the alternative to have the depositions sealed, are not aggrieved by the trial court’s order. Accordingly, the writ of error is dismissed for lack of…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Orticelli v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Cioffoletti v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Briggs v. McWeenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Gladysz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Branch v. OcchioneroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by30 opinions

  1. Cadle Co. v. D'AddarioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. State v. PrestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. In Re Allison G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. State v. MullinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. State v. T.D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API