Legal Opinion
Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. Sullivan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 21, 1990No. 13629PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred when it denied a motion to open and modify a judgment of strict foreclosure pursuant to General Statutes § 49-15.* 2 We conclude that the motion should have been granted and accordingly reverse.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. On May 15, 1986, the defendants Martin F. and Patricia M. Sullivan (younger Sullivans) executed a mortgage deed on *344their property located in East Hampton to the plaintiff, Farmers and Mechanics Savings Bank, to secure a promissory note in the amount of $72,000. In December, 1986, the defendants…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Ferguson v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Kurzatkowski v. KurzatkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. IrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Ral Management, Inc. v. Valley View AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- First Connecticut Capital, LLC v. Homes of Westport, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Castonguay v. PlourdeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- BayBank Connecticut, N.A. v. ThumlertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Altberg v. Paul Kovacs Tire Shop, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.