Kulmacz v. Kulmacz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
The basic issue presented by the plaintiff on this appeal is the question of which of two dates was the effective date of a decree of divorce granted to the plaintiff from the defendant. The determination of this question could possibly decide the admissibility of a will that the defendant executed between the two dates, because a will may be revoked by a subsequent divorce. See General Statutes §45-162 (b). We do not reach this issue, however, because of our conclusion that the plaintiff is not an aggrieved party legally capable of appealing the decisions of the referee and the trial court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- LaReau v. ReinckeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Liistro v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Waterbury Trust Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Foss v. FossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Rollins v. HolcombSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sullivan v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Laurel Park, Inc. v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Cannavo Enterprises, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Hartford Principals' & Supervisors' Ass'n v. SheddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Zoning Board of Appeals v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.