Legal Opinion
Tsarnas v. Bailey
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 13, 1962No. Civ. 20096PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered on December 30, 1960, pursuant to a remand from this court in Tsarnas v. Bailey, No. 18545, 179 Cal.App.2d 332 [3 Cal.Rptr. 629], decreeing that $8,168 was due to the plaintiffs. The original action was on a common count and the defendant answered and cross-complained. The trial resulted in a judgment for the plaintiffs in the amount of $11,553.20. On the prior appeal to this court (Division One), the judgment against the defendant on the cross-complaint and counterclaim was affirmed and the judgment on the complaint in favor of the plaintiffs was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gore v. BingamanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Tsarnas v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Peebler v. SeawellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Western Electro-Plating Co. v. HennessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Stafford v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ayyad v. Sprint SpectrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. DutraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Grubb & Ellis Co. v. SpenglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Hanna v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. DutraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.