Grubb & Ellis Co. v. Spengler

Opinion

FEINERMAN, P. J.

Defendant, Daniel S. Spengler (Spengler), who appears here in pro. per., purports to appeal from the memorandum of decision and notice of intended judgment. A memorandum of decision is not an appealable order. (Estate of Pieper (1964) 224 Cal.App.2d 670, 675 [37 Cal. Rptr. 46].) However, we construe the notice of appeal, filed November 26, 1980, as referring to the judgment entered August 4, 1980. (See Gregory v. Hamilton (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d213, 215, fn. 1. [142 Cal.Rptr. 563]; Channell v. Anthony (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 290, 302 [129 Cal.Rptr. 704].)

Suit was originally…