Legal Opinion
Tsarnas v. Bailey
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1960No. Civ. 18545PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEVINE, J. pro tem. *
Defendant, who is also cross-complainant, appeals from a judgment which was rendered against him in amount of $11,553.20. The controversy arose from a contract relating to the manufacture of lumber.
J. B. Tsarnas and Henry Tsarnas, individually and doing business as J. B. Tsarnas and Son, operated a sawmill in Humboldt County. Walter C. Bailey, individually and doing business as West Coast Forest Products Company, operated a lumber business in San Mateo. On May 6, 1955, a contract was signed by the terms of which Bailey was to supply logs to Tsarnas and Son, who were to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gombos v. AsheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Nicholson v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Pao Ch'en Lee v. GREGORICUCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Krug v. MeehanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Roseleaf Corp. v. RadisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. County of Del NorteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Easton v. StrassburgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Tenhet v. BoswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Schonfeld v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.