Legal Opinion
People v. Dutra
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 2006No. C051198PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRISON, J.
In a prior opinion we affirmed Sarah Elizabeth Dutra’s felony convictions. (People v. Dutra (May 18, 2005, C044075) [nonpub. opn.] (Dutra I).) Based on an explicit concession at oral argument by the Attorney General we gave the People the option of accepting a midterm sentence on manslaughter, or “a remand for a sentencing trial.” (Dutra I, *1362supra, C044075.) The People did not accept the midterm sentence or petition for rehearing or review. The remittitur ordered a sentencing trial.
Because of an intervening decision of the California Supreme Court—People v. Black (2005) 35…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. PicklesimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Ayyad v. Sprint SpectrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. Hargis, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Beach Break Equities, LLC v. LowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.