Legal Opinion

Gore v. Bingaman

California Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1942No. S. F. 16287PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to quiet title to a share of the income from certain trust property and for a declaratory judgment to establish their rights under the terms of the trust, as set forth in a decree of distribution. The trial court rendered a judgment in favor of defendants, and plaintiffs appealed to the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District. That court reversed the judgment, and thereafter a hearing was denied in this court. (See Gore v. Bingaman, 29 Cal. App. (2d) 460 [85 P. (2d) 172].) The trial court thereupon entered judgment for plaintiffs in accordance with…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Washington Bridge Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. England v. Hospital of the Good SamaritanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. United Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Weiner v. Pictorial Paper Package Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. California Ass'n of Health Facilities v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API