Legal Opinion
Ayyad v. Sprint Spectrum
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 2012No. A133824PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEEDHAM, J.
In Cellphone Termination Fee Cases (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 298 [122 Cal.Rptr.3d 726] we affirmed a December 2008 *854judgment in favor of plaintiffs1 in this long-running class action against Sprint Spectrum, L.P. (Sprint). We also affirmed the trial court’s order granting Plaintiffs a partial new trial on the issue of Sprint’s actual damages and the calculation of a setoff to which Sprint might be entitled. (Id. at pp. 303, 330.) In our disposition, we remanded for further proceedings limited to those issues. (Id. at p. 330.)
When the matter returned to the trial court, Sprint…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ducoing Management, Inc. v. Superior Court of Orange CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Ramirez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Dalton v. Francis CA6California Court of Appeal · 2014
- De la Cerra v. Coastline Commercial Capital CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Dickerson v. Perry & Papenhausen, Inc. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.