Legal Opinion
Peebler v. Seawell
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 11, 1954No. Civ. 4707PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
— On August 30, 1945, plaintiffs, owners of real property in Indio, entered into a written lease of the premises to defendant J. F. Seawell and H. H. Snow. The lease was for five years at a monthly rental of $150, with an option to purchase as follows:
“12. Lessees are hereby granted an option to purchase said real property at the expiration of said term or any renewal thereof by giving to the lessors at least sixty days notice in writing of such election before the end of said term or renewal thereof. In the event the price cannot be mutually agreed upon, the same shall be fixed by board of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cates v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Rosland v. ConstantineauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Murfee v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Walter G. Reese Co. v. HouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Knowles v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Maron v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Summit Industrial Equipment, Inc. v. Koll/Wells Bay AreaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Schomaker v. OsborneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Tsarnas v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Fabares v. BenjaminCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.