Legal Opinion

Raisch v. Regents of Univ. of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1918No. Civ. No. 2398PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLY, J., pro tem.

The regents of the University of California were, on April 1, 1911, and still are, the owners of an irregular shaped block of land in the city and county of San Francisco, bounded by First Avenue, Parnassus Avenue, Kirkham, sometimes called K, Street, and Fourth Avenue, embracing about thirteen and one-half acres of land. Raisch, a street contractor, did street work, consisting of grading and sewer construction, on Fourth Avenue along the entire front of the university property, and also upon the intersections of that avenue with Kirkham Street and Parnassus Avenue. This…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City St. Improvement Co. v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Witter v. Mission School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Diggins v. HartshorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ryan v. AltschulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Parker v. ReayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Inglewood v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Newmarker v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. City of Saratoga v. HuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. People Ex Rel. Moody v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Reclamation District No. 684 v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API