Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Moody v. Carter

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1936No. Civ. 10578PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

Carter is the mayor and commissioner of public safety in the city of Santa Monica. During his incumbency of those positions the City Council of Santa Monica, composed of Carter and two others, elected Carter (Carter not voting) as the representative of Santa Monica to the directorate of the Metropolitan Water District. (Metropolitan Water District Act; Deering’s General Laws, 1931, Act 9129.)

This action is one in quo warranto, and is in three counts. It is brought for the purpose of removing Carter from the board of the Metropolitan Water District for the following reasons,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Fragley v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. People ex rel. Attorney General v. ProvinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adams v. WolffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. People Ex Rel. Bagshaw v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. City of Berkeley v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Opinion No. (2007), California Attorney General Reports2007
  5. Opinion No. (2007), California Attorney General Reports2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API