Legal Opinion

City St. Improvement Co. v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1908No. S.F. No. 4558PublishedCited by 37 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Bishop, Wheeler & Hoefler, and Alfred J. Harwood, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

J.—By this action plaintiff sought to enforce a street-assessment lien after performance of his contract upon certain real property situated in the city and county of San Francisco, legal title to which stands in the name of the regents of the University of California. The allegations usual and pertinent to such an action were pleaded, and, in addition thereto, it was alleged that the land upon which it was sought to impose the lien was entirely unimproved, vacant and unoccupied, and was and is held and devoted solely to the private uses of the defendant, and is not incidental to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hassan v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Mayrhofer v. Board of Education of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. City of Atlanta v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  4. City of San Diego v. Linda Vista Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. In re Estate of RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. San Francisco Labor Council v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Ishimatsu v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Sellers v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. City of Inglewood v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. City & County of Denver v. TihenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API