Legal Opinion
Newmarker v. Regents of University of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 20, 1958No. Civ. 17686PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.
Plaintiffs, who are employees of the defendants, filed a complaint for declaratory relief to determine their rights to sick leave accrued before July 1, 1954. Both sides waived a jury trial. The court made findings of fact that the plaintiffs were not entitled to any sick leave and that all accrued sick leave accumulated by the plaintiffs up to July 1, 1954, was cancelled on that date, and entered judgment in favor of the defendants. Plaintiffs ’ motion for a new trial was denied, and this appeal from the judgment ensued.
The chronology of events leading to the controversy is as follows: On…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hamilton v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Norwalk Teachers' Ass'n v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
- California Employment Stabilization Commission v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Goldberg v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIF.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Buckley v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Ishimatsu v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.