Parker v. Reay
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The action was brought to foreclose a street assessment for work done in the city and county of San Francisco, under the act of April 1, 1872. The work consisted in constructing basalt block gutter-ways on Tyler Street, from the easterly line of Scott Street to Devisadero Street, in macadamizing the roadway thereof between the gutter-ways, and in laying granite cross-walks across Scott Street and across Seymour Avenue, at their intersection with Tyler Street. The…
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
1. The assessments levied against lot 13 are separately made and particularly defined in the assessment list. The lot was properly assessed the sum of $647.41 for the construction of gutter-ways and macadam. The other assessment, $62.90, for the crossing on Scott and Tyler streets, should have been made against the east one half of the lot, and the diagram ought to have shown what portion was assessed. (Stats. 1871-72, sec. 8, subd. 3, p. 810.) This portion of the assessment was void, and the demand therefor was invalid; but the assessment for macadam and gutter-ways having been made…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eddelbuttel v. DurrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by13 opinions
- Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- Joseph Denunzio Fruit Co. v. CraneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
- Cameron v. Ah QuongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Kumle v. Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United WorkmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Ryan v. AltschulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.