Legal Opinion
Reclamation District No. 684 v. East Bay Municipal Utility District
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 19, 1928No. Docket No. 3352PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PULLEN, J., pro tem.
The East Bay Municipal Utility District comprises nine cities on the easterly side of San Francisco Bay, and was organized to perform certain municipal functions, one of which was to bring a publicly owned water supply from the Mokelumne River in Amador County to the Utility District for the use of the District and its inhabitants.
It was founded pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Utility District Act (Stats. 1921, p. 245), and it is conceded by the parties to this proceeding that it is a public agency.
The Utility District has lands within Reclamation District No.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City St. Improvement Co. v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1908
- City of San Diego v. Linda Vista Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- City & County of San Francisco v. McGovernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Witter v. Mission School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- City of Fresno v. Fresno Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Inglewood v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Morris v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Saratoga v. HuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People Ex Rel. Moody v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- California ex rel. Department of Public Works v. 25.09 Acres of LandsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.