Legal Opinion

Witter v. Mission School District

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1898No. L. A. No. 275PublishedCited by 24 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. V. A. Gregg, Judge. The facts aré stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action to enforce payment of assessment for constructing a sidewalk in front of certain lots in the city of San *351Luis Obispo, of which defendant, Mission School District, is alleged to be the owner in fee. Judgment passed for defendants on demurrer to the sufficiency of facts alleged, from which this appeal is prosecuted.

The complaint does not show whether the lots in question were or were not used by the district for school purposes, nor that any provision was made by the district for the payment of the debt out of its funds raised during the year the debt was created.

The only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mayrhofer v. Board of Education of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Skelly v. Westminster School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. City of San Diego v. Linda Vista Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Whittaker v. County of TuolumneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Clark v. City of Los AngeLesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. City of Inglewood v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  5. City St. Improvement Co. v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1908

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API