Legal Opinion
The United States v. George S. Rush, D/B/A Rush Engineers
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 10, 1986No. Appeal 86-862PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
DECISION
Appeal from an order of the United States Claims Court, granting the Government’s motion for a default judgment against third-party defendant, George S. Rush, d/b/a Rush Engineers (Rush), and denying Rush’s motion to set aside that judgment, 9 Cl.Ct. 316 (1986). We affirm. *
OPINION
Because Rush’s April 11, 1985 motion to dismiss the contingent cross-claim contained nothing whatever to indicate any objection to the alleged insufficiency of service in this case, the Claims Court correctly determined that Rush had waived any objection he may have had concerning that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Bowser, Inc. v. The United States and General Steel Tank Co., Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Maryland Casualty Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Southern California Edison Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Southern California Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.