Legal Opinion

Wolfchild v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 16, 2005No. 03-2684LPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

This Indian trust case has been brought by over 1,000 individuals claiming descent from Indians in Minnesota who were previously members of the Mdewakanton band of Sioux Indians (the “loyal Mdewakanton”). Pending before the court are sets of motions that stem from the court’s prior decision reported as Wolfchild v. United States, 62 Fed.Cl. 521 (2004). In that decision, the court denied the government’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims of breach of fiduciary duties and for attorney’s fees, but granted the government’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claim for…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Gayle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Whalen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API