Legal Opinion

Miller v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 9, 2005No. 05-737 CPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

Before the court is plaintiffs “Complaint Under 28 U[.]S[.]C[.] § 1491 and 42 U[.]S[.]C[J § 1985 International Covenant/Conspiracy” (complaint or Compl.) filed pro se on July 8, 2005.1 For the following reasons, plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED-IN-PART for lack of jurisdiction.

I. Jurisdiction of the United States Court of Federal Claims

A. Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Like all courts in our democracy, the United States Court of Federal Claims is a court of “limited jurisdiction.” United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 3, 89 S.Ct. 1501, 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969). The Tucker…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Greenhill, Frances v. Spellings, MargaretCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  3. McCullough v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Pikulin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Fullard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API