Legal Opinion
Bowser, Inc. v. The United States and General Steel Tank Co., Inc., Third-Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 23, 1970No. 25-61PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON THIRD PARTY’S MOTION TO QUASH SUMMONS AND TO DISMISS DEFENDANT’S CONTINGENT CROSS-CLAIM
COWEN, Chief Judge.
This case again presents to the court questions as to scope of our jurisdiction over third parties impleaded under Section 14(b) of the Contract Settlement Act of 1944, 41 U.S.C. § 114(b) (1964).1 The relevant facts are as follows:
Plaintiff, Bowser, Inc., brought this suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a) (1964) to recover compensation for the unauthorized use of reissued U.S. Patent No. 24,136, covering a separator for removing water entrained or suspended in liquid fuels used in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Souffront v. La Compagnie Des Sucreries De Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. Communist PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Maryland Casualty Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Miller and Company of Birmingham, Inc. v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. C. M. Lane Lifeboat Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Penda Corporation (Now Trienda Corporation) v. The United States, and Cadillac Products, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Yaist v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.