Legal Opinion
Southern California Edison Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 11, 2000No. Nos. 99-5074, 99-5075, 99-5076, 99-5077, 99-5089, 99-5090PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
The United States and seven third-party defendants appeal the decision of the Court of Federal Claims holding that the methodology adopted by the Western Area Power Authority (“Western”) to refund excess revenues collected under energy sales contracts was unreasonable, and ordering Western to calculate the appropriate refund to which plaintiffs Southern California Edison (“SCE”) and Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (“LADWP”) were entitled. In addition, the third-party defendants contend that the Court of Federal Claims improperly exercised jurisdiction over…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- K. Kay Shearin v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Southern California Edison v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Transcom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Public Housing Authorities Directors Association v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Barbara J. Westberry, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.