Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Company v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 5, 1956No. 252-55PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, Judge.
The plaintiff, a bonding company, alleges in its petition that it furnished performance and payment bonds for a contractor with the Government; that the contractor executed an assignment, under the Assignment of Claims Act of 1940, 31 U.S.C.A. § 203, of its right to receive payments under the contract, to Fidelity Trust Company (hereinafter called Fidelity); that in the course of performance of the contract, the contractor failed to pay certain laborers and material men; that the plaintiff, pursuant to the obligation of its bond paid them, in the amount of $52,656.87; that there…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McElrath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Central National Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
- Hardin County Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
- Arlington Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
3Cited by38 opinions
- Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
- Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Rolls-Royce Limited, Derby, England, a British Company v. The United States and United Aircraft Corporation, Defendant-IntervenorUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Bowser, Inc. v. The United States and General Steel Tank Co., Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.