Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
These consolidated cases, through plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaims, call into question the constitutionality of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (CDA)1 as amended by the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982 (FCIA).2 The main issue presented in plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss is whether the Claims Court, an Article I tribunal, has jurisdiction to determine the defendant’s counterclaims3 which, according to plaintiffs, are common law breach of contract claims properly lodged only in an Article III tribunal. The plaintiffs’ second and related…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- United States v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1992
- Green Hospital v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.